TY - GEN
T1 - A gaussian process model with indirect health indicators for battery prognosis
AU - Li, Yinjia
AU - Kohtz, Sara
AU - Wang, Pingfeng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 IEEE.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - This paper focuses on predicting lithium battery capacity and state of health based on pre-recorded datasets. Data-driven techniques, including machine learning approaches have become prevalent. However, data is often inputted into these methods without much thought. Therefore, data pre-processing before utilizing machine learning techniques can optimize the performance and efficiency of these models. Since the battery degradation process is highly nonlinear and influenced by multiple factors, including both manufacturing aspects and operating conditions, which complicate the battery capacity prognostics, we need some tool that can keep track on useful data and produce reliable predictions in the end [1]. Specifically, the main methodology of this study includes defining indirect health indicators as inputs into two machine learning techniques: Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) and Feed Forward Neural Network. To demonstrate this method, the NASA battery dataset [2] is utilized; in particular, the indirect health indicators are extracted from the battery's temperature and charging state (the voltage and current change process), then a machine learning model is utilized to optimize prediction of capacity degradation.The first method for predicting the State of Health (SOH) of a battery is Gaussian Process Regression, which modifies the isotropic squared exponential kernel with an automatic relevance determination structure. The entire process extracts the highly relevant input features for capacity predictions [1]. Utilizing this method enables quick extraction of relevant data and provides fast predictions of capacity.The second strategy is Feedforward Neural Networking (FFNN). Overall, FFNN is a widely used machine learning method with outstanding performance in nonlinear modeling. It first intake one input as the starting layer, and each layer except the output layer is fully connected to the next layer, so the final prediction of FFNN is tightly connected with the previous data [3].However, the inputs to these advanced models need to be considered, as irrelevant inputs can lead to inaccurate predictions (see figure 1). Therefore, indirect health indicator (IHI) is applied as a form of feature extraction as an input to the model. Indirect health indicator is what affects the capacity of a battery during the charging or discharging state. During those processes, the performance of lithium-ion batteries will deteriorate with capacity decreasing and impedance increasing, which will cause equipment and system failures or even catastrophic loss [4]. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the IHI before predicting the model.For this study, indirect health indicators are determined with data pre-processing and are subsequently inputted into the GPR and FFNN. The results show success for capacity estimation for lithium ion batteries.
AB - This paper focuses on predicting lithium battery capacity and state of health based on pre-recorded datasets. Data-driven techniques, including machine learning approaches have become prevalent. However, data is often inputted into these methods without much thought. Therefore, data pre-processing before utilizing machine learning techniques can optimize the performance and efficiency of these models. Since the battery degradation process is highly nonlinear and influenced by multiple factors, including both manufacturing aspects and operating conditions, which complicate the battery capacity prognostics, we need some tool that can keep track on useful data and produce reliable predictions in the end [1]. Specifically, the main methodology of this study includes defining indirect health indicators as inputs into two machine learning techniques: Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) and Feed Forward Neural Network. To demonstrate this method, the NASA battery dataset [2] is utilized; in particular, the indirect health indicators are extracted from the battery's temperature and charging state (the voltage and current change process), then a machine learning model is utilized to optimize prediction of capacity degradation.The first method for predicting the State of Health (SOH) of a battery is Gaussian Process Regression, which modifies the isotropic squared exponential kernel with an automatic relevance determination structure. The entire process extracts the highly relevant input features for capacity predictions [1]. Utilizing this method enables quick extraction of relevant data and provides fast predictions of capacity.The second strategy is Feedforward Neural Networking (FFNN). Overall, FFNN is a widely used machine learning method with outstanding performance in nonlinear modeling. It first intake one input as the starting layer, and each layer except the output layer is fully connected to the next layer, so the final prediction of FFNN is tightly connected with the previous data [3].However, the inputs to these advanced models need to be considered, as irrelevant inputs can lead to inaccurate predictions (see figure 1). Therefore, indirect health indicator (IHI) is applied as a form of feature extraction as an input to the model. Indirect health indicator is what affects the capacity of a battery during the charging or discharging state. During those processes, the performance of lithium-ion batteries will deteriorate with capacity decreasing and impedance increasing, which will cause equipment and system failures or even catastrophic loss [4]. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the IHI before predicting the model.For this study, indirect health indicators are determined with data pre-processing and are subsequently inputted into the GPR and FFNN. The results show success for capacity estimation for lithium ion batteries.
KW - Gaussian Process Regression
KW - Machine Learning
KW - Neural Network
KW - SOH Estimation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85153206389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85153206389&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/RAMS51473.2023.10088180
DO - 10.1109/RAMS51473.2023.10088180
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85153206389
T3 - Proceedings - Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium
BT - 2023 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, RAMS 2023
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2023 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, RAMS 2023
Y2 - 23 January 2023 through 26 January 2023
ER -