TY - JOUR
T1 - A framework for linking competitor ecological differences to coexistence
AU - Ousterhout, Brittany H.
AU - Serrano, Mabel
AU - Bried, Jason T.
AU - Siepielski, Adam M.
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Simon Hart and Mark McPeek for valuable discussions on some of the issues we explored in this paper. Several anonymous reviewers, Adam Hasik, Jonathan Levine, Grace Showalter and Simon Tye provided valuable comments that sharpened the presentation of the ideas we present. We also thank Koby Strayhorn and Wade Boys for their assistance setting up the experiments, and Savannah Graham for support with environmental surveys. This work was supported by NSF DEB1748945.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2019 British Ecological Society
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - Not all ecological differences among competing species affect their ability to locally coexist. Rather, the differences that promote stable coexistence can be those which cause each species to experience stronger intraspecific than interspecific competition. Recent approaches have established how to detect the demographic signature of these competitive effects, but alone they cannot elucidate the ecological differences among species that yield these patterns. Here, we present a unifying experimental and observational framework that identifies potential ecological differences among species shaping their responses to intra- and interspecific competition. We first describe a conceptual model establishing why the strength of intra- and interspecific competitive interactions should vary along environmental gradients related to species ecological differences. We then show how to apply the framework using Enallagma damselflies, a diverse group of predatory aquatic insects. To determine how species responded to intra- and interspecific competition along environmental gradients, we experimentally manipulated the relative abundances of three species and replicated this across five lakes which varied in environmental conditions affecting larval damselfly per capita growth and mortality rates—key vital rates regulating their populations. Results suggest Enallagma are ecologically differentiated in ways that in some communities can result in intraspecific competition exceeding interspecific competition. However, in many cases the opposite was true, or the effects of intra- and interspecific competition were equivalent via growth and mortality responses. Moreover, these effects tended to be weak and asymmetrical among competitors, which suggests that differential responses of larval growth and mortality to intra- and interspecific competition may not contribute strongly to the maintenance of Enallagma diversity. Different environmental factors appear to shape these demographic responses to competition, providing insight into the ecological mechanisms regulating damselfly assemblages. This framework can be broadly applied to identify the ecological differences among species that may promote coexistence, advancing knowledge of the mechanisms underlying coexistence and overcoming some limitations of purely phenomenological approaches.
AB - Not all ecological differences among competing species affect their ability to locally coexist. Rather, the differences that promote stable coexistence can be those which cause each species to experience stronger intraspecific than interspecific competition. Recent approaches have established how to detect the demographic signature of these competitive effects, but alone they cannot elucidate the ecological differences among species that yield these patterns. Here, we present a unifying experimental and observational framework that identifies potential ecological differences among species shaping their responses to intra- and interspecific competition. We first describe a conceptual model establishing why the strength of intra- and interspecific competitive interactions should vary along environmental gradients related to species ecological differences. We then show how to apply the framework using Enallagma damselflies, a diverse group of predatory aquatic insects. To determine how species responded to intra- and interspecific competition along environmental gradients, we experimentally manipulated the relative abundances of three species and replicated this across five lakes which varied in environmental conditions affecting larval damselfly per capita growth and mortality rates—key vital rates regulating their populations. Results suggest Enallagma are ecologically differentiated in ways that in some communities can result in intraspecific competition exceeding interspecific competition. However, in many cases the opposite was true, or the effects of intra- and interspecific competition were equivalent via growth and mortality responses. Moreover, these effects tended to be weak and asymmetrical among competitors, which suggests that differential responses of larval growth and mortality to intra- and interspecific competition may not contribute strongly to the maintenance of Enallagma diversity. Different environmental factors appear to shape these demographic responses to competition, providing insight into the ecological mechanisms regulating damselfly assemblages. This framework can be broadly applied to identify the ecological differences among species that may promote coexistence, advancing knowledge of the mechanisms underlying coexistence and overcoming some limitations of purely phenomenological approaches.
KW - coexistence
KW - competition
KW - diversity
KW - Enallagma
KW - interspecific effects
KW - intraspecific effects
KW - niche
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068752063&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068752063&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/1365-2656.13048
DO - 10.1111/1365-2656.13048
M3 - Article
C2 - 31222738
AN - SCOPUS:85068752063
SN - 0021-8790
VL - 88
SP - 1534
EP - 1548
JO - Journal of Animal Ecology
JF - Journal of Animal Ecology
IS - 10
ER -