A Feminist, Kantian Conception of the Right to Bodily Integrity: The Cases of Abortion and Homosexuality

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Pregnant women and persons engaging in homosexual practices compose two groups that have been and still are among those most severely subjected to coercive restrictions regarding their own bodies. From an historical point of view, it is a recent and rare phenomenon that a woman's right to abortion and a person's right to engage in homosexual interactions are recognized. Although most Western liberal states currently do recognize these rights, they are under continuous assault from various political and religious movements. Moreover, though liberal theories of justice typically defend women's rights to abortion and people's rights to homosexual activity, these theories often struggle to capture the fundamental ground for these rights. For example, it appears hard for the liberal to say why and when only the woman and not the embryo/fetus has rights and why the right to certain sexual practices is not on par with rights to other preferences. Contemporary liberal theories of justice, therefore, have a hard time identifying what distinguishes questions of abortion and sexual activities from other questions of right and thereby also have difficulty capturing the gravity of the wrongdoing involved in coercively restricting homosexual interactions and abortion as such. I argue that Kant's theory of justice succeeds on both counts, because it can locate the fundamental ground for these rights in an understanding of the bodily integrity of the person. Just states will neither permit nor outlaw all abortions or sexual interactions, but rather will require all such laws to be reconcilable with the protection of each person's right to freedom.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationOut from the Shadows
Subtitle of host publicationAnalytical Feminist Contributions to Traditional Philosophy
EditorsSharon L. Crasnow, Anita M. Superson
Place of PublicationNew York
PublisherOxford University Press
Pages33-57
Number of pages25
ISBN (Electronic)9780199932788
ISBN (Print)9780199855469
DOIs
StatePublished - May 24 2012

Fingerprint

Conception
Homosexuality
Bodily Integrity
Abortion
Immanuel Kant
Person
Theory of Justice
Sexual
Interaction
Women's Rights
Fundamental
Religious Movements
Fetus
Outlaw
Embryo
Gravity
Liberal State
Wrongdoing
Activity Theory

Keywords

  • Abortion
  • Bodily integrity
  • Feminism
  • Homosexuality
  • Kant

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)

Cite this

Varden, H. (2012). A Feminist, Kantian Conception of the Right to Bodily Integrity: The Cases of Abortion and Homosexuality. In S. L. Crasnow, & A. M. Superson (Eds.), Out from the Shadows: Analytical Feminist Contributions to Traditional Philosophy (pp. 33-57). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199855469.003.0003

A Feminist, Kantian Conception of the Right to Bodily Integrity : The Cases of Abortion and Homosexuality. / Varden, Helga.

Out from the Shadows: Analytical Feminist Contributions to Traditional Philosophy. ed. / Sharon L. Crasnow; Anita M. Superson. New York : Oxford University Press, 2012. p. 33-57.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Varden, H 2012, A Feminist, Kantian Conception of the Right to Bodily Integrity: The Cases of Abortion and Homosexuality. in SL Crasnow & AM Superson (eds), Out from the Shadows: Analytical Feminist Contributions to Traditional Philosophy. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 33-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199855469.003.0003
Varden H. A Feminist, Kantian Conception of the Right to Bodily Integrity: The Cases of Abortion and Homosexuality. In Crasnow SL, Superson AM, editors, Out from the Shadows: Analytical Feminist Contributions to Traditional Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press. 2012. p. 33-57 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199855469.003.0003
Varden, Helga. / A Feminist, Kantian Conception of the Right to Bodily Integrity : The Cases of Abortion and Homosexuality. Out from the Shadows: Analytical Feminist Contributions to Traditional Philosophy. editor / Sharon L. Crasnow ; Anita M. Superson. New York : Oxford University Press, 2012. pp. 33-57
@inbook{41bcb4edcce2492ca5667756655b853d,
title = "A Feminist, Kantian Conception of the Right to Bodily Integrity: The Cases of Abortion and Homosexuality",
abstract = "Pregnant women and persons engaging in homosexual practices compose two groups that have been and still are among those most severely subjected to coercive restrictions regarding their own bodies. From an historical point of view, it is a recent and rare phenomenon that a woman's right to abortion and a person's right to engage in homosexual interactions are recognized. Although most Western liberal states currently do recognize these rights, they are under continuous assault from various political and religious movements. Moreover, though liberal theories of justice typically defend women's rights to abortion and people's rights to homosexual activity, these theories often struggle to capture the fundamental ground for these rights. For example, it appears hard for the liberal to say why and when only the woman and not the embryo/fetus has rights and why the right to certain sexual practices is not on par with rights to other preferences. Contemporary liberal theories of justice, therefore, have a hard time identifying what distinguishes questions of abortion and sexual activities from other questions of right and thereby also have difficulty capturing the gravity of the wrongdoing involved in coercively restricting homosexual interactions and abortion as such. I argue that Kant's theory of justice succeeds on both counts, because it can locate the fundamental ground for these rights in an understanding of the bodily integrity of the person. Just states will neither permit nor outlaw all abortions or sexual interactions, but rather will require all such laws to be reconcilable with the protection of each person's right to freedom.",
keywords = "Abortion, Bodily integrity, Feminism, Homosexuality, Kant",
author = "Helga Varden",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199855469.003.0003",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780199855469",
pages = "33--57",
editor = "Crasnow, {Sharon L.} and Superson, {Anita M.}",
booktitle = "Out from the Shadows",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - A Feminist, Kantian Conception of the Right to Bodily Integrity

T2 - The Cases of Abortion and Homosexuality

AU - Varden, Helga

PY - 2012/5/24

Y1 - 2012/5/24

N2 - Pregnant women and persons engaging in homosexual practices compose two groups that have been and still are among those most severely subjected to coercive restrictions regarding their own bodies. From an historical point of view, it is a recent and rare phenomenon that a woman's right to abortion and a person's right to engage in homosexual interactions are recognized. Although most Western liberal states currently do recognize these rights, they are under continuous assault from various political and religious movements. Moreover, though liberal theories of justice typically defend women's rights to abortion and people's rights to homosexual activity, these theories often struggle to capture the fundamental ground for these rights. For example, it appears hard for the liberal to say why and when only the woman and not the embryo/fetus has rights and why the right to certain sexual practices is not on par with rights to other preferences. Contemporary liberal theories of justice, therefore, have a hard time identifying what distinguishes questions of abortion and sexual activities from other questions of right and thereby also have difficulty capturing the gravity of the wrongdoing involved in coercively restricting homosexual interactions and abortion as such. I argue that Kant's theory of justice succeeds on both counts, because it can locate the fundamental ground for these rights in an understanding of the bodily integrity of the person. Just states will neither permit nor outlaw all abortions or sexual interactions, but rather will require all such laws to be reconcilable with the protection of each person's right to freedom.

AB - Pregnant women and persons engaging in homosexual practices compose two groups that have been and still are among those most severely subjected to coercive restrictions regarding their own bodies. From an historical point of view, it is a recent and rare phenomenon that a woman's right to abortion and a person's right to engage in homosexual interactions are recognized. Although most Western liberal states currently do recognize these rights, they are under continuous assault from various political and religious movements. Moreover, though liberal theories of justice typically defend women's rights to abortion and people's rights to homosexual activity, these theories often struggle to capture the fundamental ground for these rights. For example, it appears hard for the liberal to say why and when only the woman and not the embryo/fetus has rights and why the right to certain sexual practices is not on par with rights to other preferences. Contemporary liberal theories of justice, therefore, have a hard time identifying what distinguishes questions of abortion and sexual activities from other questions of right and thereby also have difficulty capturing the gravity of the wrongdoing involved in coercively restricting homosexual interactions and abortion as such. I argue that Kant's theory of justice succeeds on both counts, because it can locate the fundamental ground for these rights in an understanding of the bodily integrity of the person. Just states will neither permit nor outlaw all abortions or sexual interactions, but rather will require all such laws to be reconcilable with the protection of each person's right to freedom.

KW - Abortion

KW - Bodily integrity

KW - Feminism

KW - Homosexuality

KW - Kant

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84922820568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84922820568&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199855469.003.0003

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199855469.003.0003

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780199855469

SP - 33

EP - 57

BT - Out from the Shadows

A2 - Crasnow, Sharon L.

A2 - Superson, Anita M.

PB - Oxford University Press

CY - New York

ER -