A cross-cultural examination of subordinates' perceptions of and reactions to abusive supervision

Ryan M. Vogel, Marie S. Mitchell, Bennett J. Tepper, Simon L.D. Restubog, Changya Hu, Wei Hua, Jui Chieh Huang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This manuscript explores cross-cultural differences in reactions to perceived abusive supervision. Based on an integration of fairness heuristic theory with principles about cross-cultural differences in the importance of hierarchical status, we theorize that subordinates from the Anglo culture perceive and react to abusive supervision more negatively than subordinates from the Confucian Asian culture. The predictions were tested within two field studies. Study 1 results show that culture moderated the direct effect of perceived abusive supervision on interpersonal justice and the indirect effects of perceived abusive supervision (via interpersonal justice) on subordinates' trust in the supervisor and work effort. The negative effects of perceived abusive supervision were stronger for subordinates within the Anglo versus the Confucian Asian culture; subordinates from Anglo culture compared with Confucian Asian culture perceived abusive supervision as less fair. Perceived abusive supervision indirectly and negatively influenced subordinates' trust in the supervisor and work effort. Study 2 replicated the findings from Study 1 and extended them to show culture (Anglo vs. Confucian culture) moderated the effects because it influences subordinates' power distance orientation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)720-745
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Organizational Behavior
Volume36
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

supervision
examination
Social Justice
cultural difference
justice
Abusive supervision
fairness
heuristics
Asia

Keywords

  • Abusive supervision
  • Cross-cultural management
  • Culture
  • Interpersonal justice
  • Power distance orientation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Psychology(all)
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

A cross-cultural examination of subordinates' perceptions of and reactions to abusive supervision. / Vogel, Ryan M.; Mitchell, Marie S.; Tepper, Bennett J.; Restubog, Simon L.D.; Hu, Changya; Hua, Wei; Huang, Jui Chieh.

In: Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 36, No. 5, 01.07.2015, p. 720-745.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Vogel, Ryan M. ; Mitchell, Marie S. ; Tepper, Bennett J. ; Restubog, Simon L.D. ; Hu, Changya ; Hua, Wei ; Huang, Jui Chieh. / A cross-cultural examination of subordinates' perceptions of and reactions to abusive supervision. In: Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2015 ; Vol. 36, No. 5. pp. 720-745.
@article{14e24ec4541c4235969c47454f99b828,
title = "A cross-cultural examination of subordinates' perceptions of and reactions to abusive supervision",
abstract = "This manuscript explores cross-cultural differences in reactions to perceived abusive supervision. Based on an integration of fairness heuristic theory with principles about cross-cultural differences in the importance of hierarchical status, we theorize that subordinates from the Anglo culture perceive and react to abusive supervision more negatively than subordinates from the Confucian Asian culture. The predictions were tested within two field studies. Study 1 results show that culture moderated the direct effect of perceived abusive supervision on interpersonal justice and the indirect effects of perceived abusive supervision (via interpersonal justice) on subordinates' trust in the supervisor and work effort. The negative effects of perceived abusive supervision were stronger for subordinates within the Anglo versus the Confucian Asian culture; subordinates from Anglo culture compared with Confucian Asian culture perceived abusive supervision as less fair. Perceived abusive supervision indirectly and negatively influenced subordinates' trust in the supervisor and work effort. Study 2 replicated the findings from Study 1 and extended them to show culture (Anglo vs. Confucian culture) moderated the effects because it influences subordinates' power distance orientation.",
keywords = "Abusive supervision, Cross-cultural management, Culture, Interpersonal justice, Power distance orientation",
author = "Vogel, {Ryan M.} and Mitchell, {Marie S.} and Tepper, {Bennett J.} and Restubog, {Simon L.D.} and Changya Hu and Wei Hua and Huang, {Jui Chieh}",
year = "2015",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/job.1984",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "720--745",
journal = "Journal of Organizational Behavior",
issn = "0894-3796",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A cross-cultural examination of subordinates' perceptions of and reactions to abusive supervision

AU - Vogel, Ryan M.

AU - Mitchell, Marie S.

AU - Tepper, Bennett J.

AU - Restubog, Simon L.D.

AU - Hu, Changya

AU - Hua, Wei

AU - Huang, Jui Chieh

PY - 2015/7/1

Y1 - 2015/7/1

N2 - This manuscript explores cross-cultural differences in reactions to perceived abusive supervision. Based on an integration of fairness heuristic theory with principles about cross-cultural differences in the importance of hierarchical status, we theorize that subordinates from the Anglo culture perceive and react to abusive supervision more negatively than subordinates from the Confucian Asian culture. The predictions were tested within two field studies. Study 1 results show that culture moderated the direct effect of perceived abusive supervision on interpersonal justice and the indirect effects of perceived abusive supervision (via interpersonal justice) on subordinates' trust in the supervisor and work effort. The negative effects of perceived abusive supervision were stronger for subordinates within the Anglo versus the Confucian Asian culture; subordinates from Anglo culture compared with Confucian Asian culture perceived abusive supervision as less fair. Perceived abusive supervision indirectly and negatively influenced subordinates' trust in the supervisor and work effort. Study 2 replicated the findings from Study 1 and extended them to show culture (Anglo vs. Confucian culture) moderated the effects because it influences subordinates' power distance orientation.

AB - This manuscript explores cross-cultural differences in reactions to perceived abusive supervision. Based on an integration of fairness heuristic theory with principles about cross-cultural differences in the importance of hierarchical status, we theorize that subordinates from the Anglo culture perceive and react to abusive supervision more negatively than subordinates from the Confucian Asian culture. The predictions were tested within two field studies. Study 1 results show that culture moderated the direct effect of perceived abusive supervision on interpersonal justice and the indirect effects of perceived abusive supervision (via interpersonal justice) on subordinates' trust in the supervisor and work effort. The negative effects of perceived abusive supervision were stronger for subordinates within the Anglo versus the Confucian Asian culture; subordinates from Anglo culture compared with Confucian Asian culture perceived abusive supervision as less fair. Perceived abusive supervision indirectly and negatively influenced subordinates' trust in the supervisor and work effort. Study 2 replicated the findings from Study 1 and extended them to show culture (Anglo vs. Confucian culture) moderated the effects because it influences subordinates' power distance orientation.

KW - Abusive supervision

KW - Cross-cultural management

KW - Culture

KW - Interpersonal justice

KW - Power distance orientation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947746474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947746474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/job.1984

DO - 10.1002/job.1984

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84947746474

VL - 36

SP - 720

EP - 745

JO - Journal of Organizational Behavior

JF - Journal of Organizational Behavior

SN - 0894-3796

IS - 5

ER -