A comparison of two orion skip entry guidance algorithms

Jeremy R. Rea, Zachary R Putnam

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

The Orion capsule is required to have landing site access (either on land or in water) inside the Continental United States (CONUS) for lunar returns anytime during the lunar month. This requirement means the vehicle must be capable of flying ranges of at least 5500 nm. For a blunt body entry vehicle, these ranges are easily achieved through the use of a skip entry trajectory. A skip entry guidance algorithm is required to achieve accurate landings at these downranges. Two skip entry guidance algorithms have been developed: the Numerical Skip Entry Guidance (NSEG), developed at NAS A/JSC and PredGuid, developed at the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory. A comparison of these algorithms is presented in this paper. Each algorithm has been implemented in a six-degree-of-freedom simulation called the Advanced NASA Technology Architecture for Exploration Studies (ANTARES). NASA, Lockheed, and Draper engineers have completed several Monte Carlo analyses in order to compare the performance of each algorithm in various stress states. Each algorithm has been tested for entry-to-target ranges to include direct entries and skip entries of varying length. Dispersions have been included on the initial entry interface state, vehicle mass properties, vehicle aerodynamics, atmosphere, and Reaction Control System (RCS). Performance criteria include miss distance at drogue deploy and landing, RCS fuel usage, maximum g-loads and heat rates for the first and second entry, total heat load, and control system saturation. The comparison resulted in the PredGuid algorithm being selected as the primary skip entry guidance algorithm for Orion Preliminary Design Review analyses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCollection of Technical Papers - AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2007
Pages1155-1173
Number of pages19
Volume2
StatePublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes
EventAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2007 - Hilton Head, SC, United States
Duration: Aug 20 2007Aug 23 2007

Other

OtherAIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2007
CountryUnited States
CityHilton Head, SC
Period8/20/078/23/07

Fingerprint

Landing
Control systems
NASA
Interface states
Thermal load
Dispersions
Enthalpy
Aerodynamics
Trajectories
Engineers
Water

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Rea, J. R., & Putnam, Z. R. (2007). A comparison of two orion skip entry guidance algorithms. In Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2007 (Vol. 2, pp. 1155-1173)

A comparison of two orion skip entry guidance algorithms. / Rea, Jeremy R.; Putnam, Zachary R.

Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2007. Vol. 2 2007. p. 1155-1173.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Rea, JR & Putnam, ZR 2007, A comparison of two orion skip entry guidance algorithms. in Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2007. vol. 2, pp. 1155-1173, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2007, Hilton Head, SC, United States, 8/20/07.
Rea JR, Putnam ZR. A comparison of two orion skip entry guidance algorithms. In Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2007. Vol. 2. 2007. p. 1155-1173
Rea, Jeremy R. ; Putnam, Zachary R. / A comparison of two orion skip entry guidance algorithms. Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2007. Vol. 2 2007. pp. 1155-1173
@inproceedings{ac23917b3179499897c4ba1a5204f05c,
title = "A comparison of two orion skip entry guidance algorithms",
abstract = "The Orion capsule is required to have landing site access (either on land or in water) inside the Continental United States (CONUS) for lunar returns anytime during the lunar month. This requirement means the vehicle must be capable of flying ranges of at least 5500 nm. For a blunt body entry vehicle, these ranges are easily achieved through the use of a skip entry trajectory. A skip entry guidance algorithm is required to achieve accurate landings at these downranges. Two skip entry guidance algorithms have been developed: the Numerical Skip Entry Guidance (NSEG), developed at NAS A/JSC and PredGuid, developed at the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory. A comparison of these algorithms is presented in this paper. Each algorithm has been implemented in a six-degree-of-freedom simulation called the Advanced NASA Technology Architecture for Exploration Studies (ANTARES). NASA, Lockheed, and Draper engineers have completed several Monte Carlo analyses in order to compare the performance of each algorithm in various stress states. Each algorithm has been tested for entry-to-target ranges to include direct entries and skip entries of varying length. Dispersions have been included on the initial entry interface state, vehicle mass properties, vehicle aerodynamics, atmosphere, and Reaction Control System (RCS). Performance criteria include miss distance at drogue deploy and landing, RCS fuel usage, maximum g-loads and heat rates for the first and second entry, total heat load, and control system saturation. The comparison resulted in the PredGuid algorithm being selected as the primary skip entry guidance algorithm for Orion Preliminary Design Review analyses.",
author = "Rea, {Jeremy R.} and Putnam, {Zachary R}",
year = "2007",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "1563479044",
volume = "2",
pages = "1155--1173",
booktitle = "Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2007",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - A comparison of two orion skip entry guidance algorithms

AU - Rea, Jeremy R.

AU - Putnam, Zachary R

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - The Orion capsule is required to have landing site access (either on land or in water) inside the Continental United States (CONUS) for lunar returns anytime during the lunar month. This requirement means the vehicle must be capable of flying ranges of at least 5500 nm. For a blunt body entry vehicle, these ranges are easily achieved through the use of a skip entry trajectory. A skip entry guidance algorithm is required to achieve accurate landings at these downranges. Two skip entry guidance algorithms have been developed: the Numerical Skip Entry Guidance (NSEG), developed at NAS A/JSC and PredGuid, developed at the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory. A comparison of these algorithms is presented in this paper. Each algorithm has been implemented in a six-degree-of-freedom simulation called the Advanced NASA Technology Architecture for Exploration Studies (ANTARES). NASA, Lockheed, and Draper engineers have completed several Monte Carlo analyses in order to compare the performance of each algorithm in various stress states. Each algorithm has been tested for entry-to-target ranges to include direct entries and skip entries of varying length. Dispersions have been included on the initial entry interface state, vehicle mass properties, vehicle aerodynamics, atmosphere, and Reaction Control System (RCS). Performance criteria include miss distance at drogue deploy and landing, RCS fuel usage, maximum g-loads and heat rates for the first and second entry, total heat load, and control system saturation. The comparison resulted in the PredGuid algorithm being selected as the primary skip entry guidance algorithm for Orion Preliminary Design Review analyses.

AB - The Orion capsule is required to have landing site access (either on land or in water) inside the Continental United States (CONUS) for lunar returns anytime during the lunar month. This requirement means the vehicle must be capable of flying ranges of at least 5500 nm. For a blunt body entry vehicle, these ranges are easily achieved through the use of a skip entry trajectory. A skip entry guidance algorithm is required to achieve accurate landings at these downranges. Two skip entry guidance algorithms have been developed: the Numerical Skip Entry Guidance (NSEG), developed at NAS A/JSC and PredGuid, developed at the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory. A comparison of these algorithms is presented in this paper. Each algorithm has been implemented in a six-degree-of-freedom simulation called the Advanced NASA Technology Architecture for Exploration Studies (ANTARES). NASA, Lockheed, and Draper engineers have completed several Monte Carlo analyses in order to compare the performance of each algorithm in various stress states. Each algorithm has been tested for entry-to-target ranges to include direct entries and skip entries of varying length. Dispersions have been included on the initial entry interface state, vehicle mass properties, vehicle aerodynamics, atmosphere, and Reaction Control System (RCS). Performance criteria include miss distance at drogue deploy and landing, RCS fuel usage, maximum g-loads and heat rates for the first and second entry, total heat load, and control system saturation. The comparison resulted in the PredGuid algorithm being selected as the primary skip entry guidance algorithm for Orion Preliminary Design Review analyses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=37249022345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=37249022345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:37249022345

SN - 1563479044

SN - 9781563479045

VL - 2

SP - 1155

EP - 1173

BT - Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2007

ER -