A comparison of two latency insertion methods in dependent sources applications

Ping Liu, Jilin Tan, Zhongyong Zhou, Jose E Schutt-Aine, Patrick Goh

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

This paper compares two different formulations of the latency insertion method (LIM) for the analysis of circuits with dependent sources. One is the scalar LIM and the other is the amplification matrix LIM. Numerical experiments demonstrate that the scalar LIM necessitates much smaller time step than the amplification matrix LIM when handling certain types of dependent sources indicating better performance of the latter technique without a sacrifice in accuracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publication2011 IEEE 20th Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems, EPEPS-2011
Pages295-298
Number of pages4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2011
Event2011 IEEE 20th Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems, EPEPS-2011 - San Jose, CA, United States
Duration: Oct 23 2011Oct 26 2011

Publication series

Name2011 IEEE 20th Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems, EPEPS-2011

Other

Other2011 IEEE 20th Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems, EPEPS-2011
CountryUnited States
CitySan Jose, CA
Period10/23/1110/26/11

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • amplification matrix LIM
  • dependent sources
  • latency insertion methods(LIM)
  • scalar LIM

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Liu, P., Tan, J., Zhou, Z., Schutt-Aine, J. E., & Goh, P. (2011). A comparison of two latency insertion methods in dependent sources applications. In 2011 IEEE 20th Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems, EPEPS-2011 (pp. 295-298). [6100250] (2011 IEEE 20th Conference on Electrical Performance of Electronic Packaging and Systems, EPEPS-2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/EPEPS.2011.6100250