A comparison of three methods to evaluate otter latrine activity

Nelda A. Rivera, Samantha Totoni, Kathryn Monick, Ting Tian, Michelle L. Green, Jan E Novakofski, Nohra E Mateus-Pinilla

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We compared methods commonly used in the field of river otter (Lontra canadensis) ecology to estimate visitation rates. We evaluated visitation rates estimated from 2 survey protocols based on video detection—individual visitation rate (IVR) and recording visitation rate (RVR)—and one indirect method based on scat detection—scat visitation rate (SVR). From August 2011 through August 2012, overall scat detection and cumulative video data from 403 camera-days in 2 latrine sites (River and Pond, at a study site adjacent to the Salt Fork of the Vermilion River near Fairmount, Illinois, USA) located <50 m apart did not reveal monthly or seasonal differences between SVR and video detection methods. We identified positive correlations among the 3 visitation rates and differences between overall IVR and RVR. All 3 methods resulted in peak visitation rates during winter. However, when these data were stratified by latrine site, we found both positive and negative correlations at the River latrine. Our work supports that SVR, IVR, and RVR are valuable methods to estimate otter visitation rates at latrine sites. However, it is clear that even within such a short distance between these 2 latrines, these methods detected differences in site utilization. The significant positive correlation observed between IVR and RVR (overall and by latrine site) suggests these methods can be used interchangeably. Otter detection using SVR may serve as a complementary assessment tool for IVR and RVR. To optimize cross-study comparisons and interpretation of results, future studies should detail the type of otter detection and visitation rate used, how variables are measured, formulas used in the calculation of the visitation rates, and detailed descriptions of scat counting efforts when using scat as a tool to evaluate otter visitation rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)198-207
Number of pages10
JournalWildlife Society Bulletin
Volume43
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2019

Fingerprint

feces
comparison
rate
method
river
detection method
pond
ecology
salt
winter
detection
video

Keywords

  • Lontra canadensis
  • consistency
  • repeatability
  • scat detection
  • spraint detection
  • visitation rate

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

A comparison of three methods to evaluate otter latrine activity. / Rivera, Nelda A.; Totoni, Samantha; Monick, Kathryn; Tian, Ting; Green, Michelle L.; Novakofski, Jan E; Mateus-Pinilla, Nohra E.

In: Wildlife Society Bulletin, Vol. 43, No. 1, 03.2019, p. 198-207.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rivera, Nelda A. ; Totoni, Samantha ; Monick, Kathryn ; Tian, Ting ; Green, Michelle L. ; Novakofski, Jan E ; Mateus-Pinilla, Nohra E. / A comparison of three methods to evaluate otter latrine activity. In: Wildlife Society Bulletin. 2019 ; Vol. 43, No. 1. pp. 198-207.
@article{2b567de720f24c489b88b95cb088c64f,
title = "A comparison of three methods to evaluate otter latrine activity",
abstract = "We compared methods commonly used in the field of river otter (Lontra canadensis) ecology to estimate visitation rates. We evaluated visitation rates estimated from 2 survey protocols based on video detection—individual visitation rate (IVR) and recording visitation rate (RVR)—and one indirect method based on scat detection—scat visitation rate (SVR). From August 2011 through August 2012, overall scat detection and cumulative video data from 403 camera-days in 2 latrine sites (River and Pond, at a study site adjacent to the Salt Fork of the Vermilion River near Fairmount, Illinois, USA) located <50 m apart did not reveal monthly or seasonal differences between SVR and video detection methods. We identified positive correlations among the 3 visitation rates and differences between overall IVR and RVR. All 3 methods resulted in peak visitation rates during winter. However, when these data were stratified by latrine site, we found both positive and negative correlations at the River latrine. Our work supports that SVR, IVR, and RVR are valuable methods to estimate otter visitation rates at latrine sites. However, it is clear that even within such a short distance between these 2 latrines, these methods detected differences in site utilization. The significant positive correlation observed between IVR and RVR (overall and by latrine site) suggests these methods can be used interchangeably. Otter detection using SVR may serve as a complementary assessment tool for IVR and RVR. To optimize cross-study comparisons and interpretation of results, future studies should detail the type of otter detection and visitation rate used, how variables are measured, formulas used in the calculation of the visitation rates, and detailed descriptions of scat counting efforts when using scat as a tool to evaluate otter visitation rates.",
keywords = "Lontra canadensis, consistency, repeatability, scat detection, spraint detection, visitation rate",
author = "Rivera, {Nelda A.} and Samantha Totoni and Kathryn Monick and Ting Tian and Green, {Michelle L.} and Novakofski, {Jan E} and Mateus-Pinilla, {Nohra E}",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1002/wsb.947",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "198--207",
journal = "Wildlife Society Bulletin",
issn = "0091-7648",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of three methods to evaluate otter latrine activity

AU - Rivera, Nelda A.

AU - Totoni, Samantha

AU - Monick, Kathryn

AU - Tian, Ting

AU - Green, Michelle L.

AU - Novakofski, Jan E

AU - Mateus-Pinilla, Nohra E

PY - 2019/3

Y1 - 2019/3

N2 - We compared methods commonly used in the field of river otter (Lontra canadensis) ecology to estimate visitation rates. We evaluated visitation rates estimated from 2 survey protocols based on video detection—individual visitation rate (IVR) and recording visitation rate (RVR)—and one indirect method based on scat detection—scat visitation rate (SVR). From August 2011 through August 2012, overall scat detection and cumulative video data from 403 camera-days in 2 latrine sites (River and Pond, at a study site adjacent to the Salt Fork of the Vermilion River near Fairmount, Illinois, USA) located <50 m apart did not reveal monthly or seasonal differences between SVR and video detection methods. We identified positive correlations among the 3 visitation rates and differences between overall IVR and RVR. All 3 methods resulted in peak visitation rates during winter. However, when these data were stratified by latrine site, we found both positive and negative correlations at the River latrine. Our work supports that SVR, IVR, and RVR are valuable methods to estimate otter visitation rates at latrine sites. However, it is clear that even within such a short distance between these 2 latrines, these methods detected differences in site utilization. The significant positive correlation observed between IVR and RVR (overall and by latrine site) suggests these methods can be used interchangeably. Otter detection using SVR may serve as a complementary assessment tool for IVR and RVR. To optimize cross-study comparisons and interpretation of results, future studies should detail the type of otter detection and visitation rate used, how variables are measured, formulas used in the calculation of the visitation rates, and detailed descriptions of scat counting efforts when using scat as a tool to evaluate otter visitation rates.

AB - We compared methods commonly used in the field of river otter (Lontra canadensis) ecology to estimate visitation rates. We evaluated visitation rates estimated from 2 survey protocols based on video detection—individual visitation rate (IVR) and recording visitation rate (RVR)—and one indirect method based on scat detection—scat visitation rate (SVR). From August 2011 through August 2012, overall scat detection and cumulative video data from 403 camera-days in 2 latrine sites (River and Pond, at a study site adjacent to the Salt Fork of the Vermilion River near Fairmount, Illinois, USA) located <50 m apart did not reveal monthly or seasonal differences between SVR and video detection methods. We identified positive correlations among the 3 visitation rates and differences between overall IVR and RVR. All 3 methods resulted in peak visitation rates during winter. However, when these data were stratified by latrine site, we found both positive and negative correlations at the River latrine. Our work supports that SVR, IVR, and RVR are valuable methods to estimate otter visitation rates at latrine sites. However, it is clear that even within such a short distance between these 2 latrines, these methods detected differences in site utilization. The significant positive correlation observed between IVR and RVR (overall and by latrine site) suggests these methods can be used interchangeably. Otter detection using SVR may serve as a complementary assessment tool for IVR and RVR. To optimize cross-study comparisons and interpretation of results, future studies should detail the type of otter detection and visitation rate used, how variables are measured, formulas used in the calculation of the visitation rates, and detailed descriptions of scat counting efforts when using scat as a tool to evaluate otter visitation rates.

KW - Lontra canadensis

KW - consistency

KW - repeatability

KW - scat detection

KW - spraint detection

KW - visitation rate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062333762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85062333762&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/wsb.947

DO - 10.1002/wsb.947

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85062333762

VL - 43

SP - 198

EP - 207

JO - Wildlife Society Bulletin

JF - Wildlife Society Bulletin

SN - 0091-7648

IS - 1

ER -