A Comparison of Three Approaches for Measuring Negative Cognitions for Psychological Reactance

Tobias Reynolds-Tylus, Elisabeth Bigsby, Brian L. Quick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Psychological reactance, routinely operationalized as a latent construct comprised of anger and negative cognitions, represents an aversive state following a threatened or eliminated freedom. The current study sought to extend the literature by comparing three distinct measures of negative cognitions: (a) trained coder (thought-listing), (b) participant coding (thought-listing), and (c) Likert scale. Participants (N = 540) were randomly assigned to view messages in a 2 (language: forceful and non-forceful) x 3 (topic: exercise, fruit and vegetable consumption, and sleep) between subjects factorial design. Exposure to forceful (vs. non-forceful) language resulted in higher negative cognitions across all three measures. Moreover, all three measures of negative cognitions were negatively associated with behavioral intention. Three competing structural models were examined, each using a different measure of negative cognitions. Results demonstrated the three models performed similarly based on comparisons of model fit and variance explained. Despite similar performance among the three measures of negative cognitions, there was a slight, but consistent advantage for the Likert scale measure model in terms of fit, variance explained, and factor loadings. Validation of these three measures of negative cognitions provides communication researchers with the flexibility to choose the measure most appropriate for their needs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)43-59
Number of pages17
JournalCommunication Methods and Measures
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2020

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparison of Three Approaches for Measuring Negative Cognitions for Psychological Reactance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this