A comparison of RIGR and SVD dynamic imaging methods

Jill M. Hanson, Zhi-Pei Liang, Richard L. Magin, Jeff L. Duerk, Paul C. Lauterbur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Several constrained imaging methods have recently been proposed for dynamic imaging applications. This paper compares two of these methods: the Reduced-encoding imaging by Generalized-series Reconstruction (RIGR) and Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) methods. RIGR utilizes a priori data for optimal image reconstruction whereas the SVD method seeks to optimize data acquisition. However, this study shows that the existing SVD encoding method tends to bias the data acquisition scheme toward reproducing the known features in the reference image. This characteristic of the SVD encoding method reduces its capability to capture new image features and makes it less suitable than RIGR for dynamic imaging applications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-167
Number of pages7
JournalMagnetic Resonance in Medicine
Volume38
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 1997

Keywords

  • Dynamic imaging
  • Fast imaging
  • Generalized series
  • Image reconstruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of RIGR and SVD dynamic imaging methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Hanson, J. M., Liang, Z-P., Magin, R. L., Duerk, J. L., & Lauterbur, P. C. (1997). A comparison of RIGR and SVD dynamic imaging methods. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 38(1), 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.1910380122