TY - JOUR
T1 - A Comparison of Normative And Interactional Explanations of Group Decision-Making
T2 - Social Decision Schemes Versus Valence Distributions
AU - Poole, Marshall Scott
AU - McPhee, Robert D.
AU - Seibold, David R.
N1 - Funding Information:
20Maier and Hoffman also posited an "adoption threshold"; once an option's cumulative valence passes the adoption threshold, it is chosen by the group. The existence of this threshold was also supported by McPhee, Poole, and Seibold. Although we will not consider this notion further in the present paper, it does bear further investigation by decision-making researchers. 21McPhee, Poole, and Seibold, "Valence Model."
Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1982/3
Y1 - 1982/3
N2 - Research on group decision-making in speech communication has assumed interaction processes are important determinants of group decisions. However, major psychological theories of group decision-making challenge this assumption. This study tested a prominent social psychological theory, Davis's Social Decision Scheme Model, against an interaction-based model of group decision-making, the Valence Distribution Model recently developed by McPhee, Poole, and Seibold. The theoretical rationale for the comparison was provided by the theory of structuration, which predicted the Valence Distribution Model would mediate the effect of Social Decision Schemes on group decisions. Results substantially supported this prediction.
AB - Research on group decision-making in speech communication has assumed interaction processes are important determinants of group decisions. However, major psychological theories of group decision-making challenge this assumption. This study tested a prominent social psychological theory, Davis's Social Decision Scheme Model, against an interaction-based model of group decision-making, the Valence Distribution Model recently developed by McPhee, Poole, and Seibold. The theoretical rationale for the comparison was provided by the theory of structuration, which predicted the Valence Distribution Model would mediate the effect of Social Decision Schemes on group decisions. Results substantially supported this prediction.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002293926&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002293926&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03637758209376067
DO - 10.1080/03637758209376067
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0002293926
SN - 0363-7751
VL - 49
SP - 1
EP - 19
JO - Communication Monographs
JF - Communication Monographs
IS - 1
ER -