A Comparison of Normative And Interactional Explanations of Group Decision-Making: Social Decision Schemes Versus Valence Distributions

Marshall Scott Poole, Robert D. McPhee, David R. Seibold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Research on group decision-making in speech communication has assumed interaction processes are important determinants of group decisions. However, major psychological theories of group decision-making challenge this assumption. This study tested a prominent social psychological theory, Davis's Social Decision Scheme Model, against an interaction-based model of group decision-making, the Valence Distribution Model recently developed by McPhee, Poole, and Seibold. The theoretical rationale for the comparison was provided by the theory of structuration, which predicted the Valence Distribution Model would mediate the effect of Social Decision Schemes on group decisions. Results substantially supported this prediction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalCommunication Monographs
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1982

Fingerprint

group decision
Decision making
decision making
psychological theory
Speech communication
structuration
interaction
Interaction
Valence
Group Decision Making
determinants
communication
Psychological Theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Language and Linguistics

Cite this

A Comparison of Normative And Interactional Explanations of Group Decision-Making : Social Decision Schemes Versus Valence Distributions. / Poole, Marshall Scott; McPhee, Robert D.; Seibold, David R.

In: Communication Monographs, Vol. 49, No. 1, 03.1982, p. 1-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fbe7793ac2044ca1b3d6e92db1b1fd3e,
title = "A Comparison of Normative And Interactional Explanations of Group Decision-Making: Social Decision Schemes Versus Valence Distributions",
abstract = "Research on group decision-making in speech communication has assumed interaction processes are important determinants of group decisions. However, major psychological theories of group decision-making challenge this assumption. This study tested a prominent social psychological theory, Davis's Social Decision Scheme Model, against an interaction-based model of group decision-making, the Valence Distribution Model recently developed by McPhee, Poole, and Seibold. The theoretical rationale for the comparison was provided by the theory of structuration, which predicted the Valence Distribution Model would mediate the effect of Social Decision Schemes on group decisions. Results substantially supported this prediction.",
author = "Poole, {Marshall Scott} and McPhee, {Robert D.} and Seibold, {David R.}",
year = "1982",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/03637758209376067",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Communication Monographs",
issn = "0363-7751",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A Comparison of Normative And Interactional Explanations of Group Decision-Making

T2 - Social Decision Schemes Versus Valence Distributions

AU - Poole, Marshall Scott

AU - McPhee, Robert D.

AU - Seibold, David R.

PY - 1982/3

Y1 - 1982/3

N2 - Research on group decision-making in speech communication has assumed interaction processes are important determinants of group decisions. However, major psychological theories of group decision-making challenge this assumption. This study tested a prominent social psychological theory, Davis's Social Decision Scheme Model, against an interaction-based model of group decision-making, the Valence Distribution Model recently developed by McPhee, Poole, and Seibold. The theoretical rationale for the comparison was provided by the theory of structuration, which predicted the Valence Distribution Model would mediate the effect of Social Decision Schemes on group decisions. Results substantially supported this prediction.

AB - Research on group decision-making in speech communication has assumed interaction processes are important determinants of group decisions. However, major psychological theories of group decision-making challenge this assumption. This study tested a prominent social psychological theory, Davis's Social Decision Scheme Model, against an interaction-based model of group decision-making, the Valence Distribution Model recently developed by McPhee, Poole, and Seibold. The theoretical rationale for the comparison was provided by the theory of structuration, which predicted the Valence Distribution Model would mediate the effect of Social Decision Schemes on group decisions. Results substantially supported this prediction.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0002293926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0002293926&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/03637758209376067

DO - 10.1080/03637758209376067

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0002293926

VL - 49

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Communication Monographs

JF - Communication Monographs

SN - 0363-7751

IS - 1

ER -