A comparison of four daylighting metrics in assessing the daylighting performance of three shading systems

Mohamed Boubekri, Jaewook Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The assessment of the daylighting performance of a design solution is a complex task due to the changing nature of daylight. A few quantitative metrics are available to designers to assess such a performance, among them are the mean hourly illuminance (MHI), the daylight factor (DF), the daylight autonomy (DA) and the useful daylight illuminance (UDI). Each of these metrics has a purpose, a set of criteria and limitations that affect the outcome of the evaluation. When to use one metric instead of another depends largely on the design goals to be achieved. Using Design Iterate Validate Adapt (DIVA) daylighting simulation program, we set out to examine the performance behavior of these four metrics with the changing dimensions of three shading devices: a horizontal overhang, a horizontal louver system, and a vertical fin system, and compare their performance behavior as the orientation changes of the window to which these devices are attached. The context is a typical classroom of a prototypical elementary school. Our results indicate that not all four metrics behave similarly as we vary the size of each shading device and as orientation changes. The lesson learned is that not all daylighting metrics lead to the same conclusions and that it is important to use the metric that corresponds to the specific goals and objectives of the design and of the daylighting solution. The UDI is the metric that leads to outcomes most different than the other three metrics investigated in this paper.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)39-53
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Green Building
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

performance behavior
Daylighting
shading
Equipment and Supplies
performance
elementary school
autonomy
classroom
simulation
evaluation
comparison

Keywords

  • Daylight autonomy
  • Daylight factor
  • Daylighting
  • Louver design
  • Mean hourly illuminance
  • Useful daylight illuminance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Architecture
  • Building and Construction
  • Environmental Science(all)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

A comparison of four daylighting metrics in assessing the daylighting performance of three shading systems. / Boubekri, Mohamed; Lee, Jaewook.

In: Journal of Green Building, Vol. 12, No. 3, 01.06.2017, p. 39-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1e7640382c944bf9b5bdc91503900b3a,
title = "A comparison of four daylighting metrics in assessing the daylighting performance of three shading systems",
abstract = "The assessment of the daylighting performance of a design solution is a complex task due to the changing nature of daylight. A few quantitative metrics are available to designers to assess such a performance, among them are the mean hourly illuminance (MHI), the daylight factor (DF), the daylight autonomy (DA) and the useful daylight illuminance (UDI). Each of these metrics has a purpose, a set of criteria and limitations that affect the outcome of the evaluation. When to use one metric instead of another depends largely on the design goals to be achieved. Using Design Iterate Validate Adapt (DIVA) daylighting simulation program, we set out to examine the performance behavior of these four metrics with the changing dimensions of three shading devices: a horizontal overhang, a horizontal louver system, and a vertical fin system, and compare their performance behavior as the orientation changes of the window to which these devices are attached. The context is a typical classroom of a prototypical elementary school. Our results indicate that not all four metrics behave similarly as we vary the size of each shading device and as orientation changes. The lesson learned is that not all daylighting metrics lead to the same conclusions and that it is important to use the metric that corresponds to the specific goals and objectives of the design and of the daylighting solution. The UDI is the metric that leads to outcomes most different than the other three metrics investigated in this paper.",
keywords = "Daylight autonomy, Daylight factor, Daylighting, Louver design, Mean hourly illuminance, Useful daylight illuminance",
author = "Mohamed Boubekri and Jaewook Lee",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3992/1943-4618.12.3.39",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "39--53",
journal = "Journal of Green Building",
issn = "1552-6100",
publisher = "College Publishing",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of four daylighting metrics in assessing the daylighting performance of three shading systems

AU - Boubekri, Mohamed

AU - Lee, Jaewook

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - The assessment of the daylighting performance of a design solution is a complex task due to the changing nature of daylight. A few quantitative metrics are available to designers to assess such a performance, among them are the mean hourly illuminance (MHI), the daylight factor (DF), the daylight autonomy (DA) and the useful daylight illuminance (UDI). Each of these metrics has a purpose, a set of criteria and limitations that affect the outcome of the evaluation. When to use one metric instead of another depends largely on the design goals to be achieved. Using Design Iterate Validate Adapt (DIVA) daylighting simulation program, we set out to examine the performance behavior of these four metrics with the changing dimensions of three shading devices: a horizontal overhang, a horizontal louver system, and a vertical fin system, and compare their performance behavior as the orientation changes of the window to which these devices are attached. The context is a typical classroom of a prototypical elementary school. Our results indicate that not all four metrics behave similarly as we vary the size of each shading device and as orientation changes. The lesson learned is that not all daylighting metrics lead to the same conclusions and that it is important to use the metric that corresponds to the specific goals and objectives of the design and of the daylighting solution. The UDI is the metric that leads to outcomes most different than the other three metrics investigated in this paper.

AB - The assessment of the daylighting performance of a design solution is a complex task due to the changing nature of daylight. A few quantitative metrics are available to designers to assess such a performance, among them are the mean hourly illuminance (MHI), the daylight factor (DF), the daylight autonomy (DA) and the useful daylight illuminance (UDI). Each of these metrics has a purpose, a set of criteria and limitations that affect the outcome of the evaluation. When to use one metric instead of another depends largely on the design goals to be achieved. Using Design Iterate Validate Adapt (DIVA) daylighting simulation program, we set out to examine the performance behavior of these four metrics with the changing dimensions of three shading devices: a horizontal overhang, a horizontal louver system, and a vertical fin system, and compare their performance behavior as the orientation changes of the window to which these devices are attached. The context is a typical classroom of a prototypical elementary school. Our results indicate that not all four metrics behave similarly as we vary the size of each shading device and as orientation changes. The lesson learned is that not all daylighting metrics lead to the same conclusions and that it is important to use the metric that corresponds to the specific goals and objectives of the design and of the daylighting solution. The UDI is the metric that leads to outcomes most different than the other three metrics investigated in this paper.

KW - Daylight autonomy

KW - Daylight factor

KW - Daylighting

KW - Louver design

KW - Mean hourly illuminance

KW - Useful daylight illuminance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85030684039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85030684039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3992/1943-4618.12.3.39

DO - 10.3992/1943-4618.12.3.39

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85030684039

VL - 12

SP - 39

EP - 53

JO - Journal of Green Building

JF - Journal of Green Building

SN - 1552-6100

IS - 3

ER -