A comparison of concurrent and retrospective trajectories of commitment to wed

Brian Gabriel Ogolsky, Catherine A. Surra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

How well do dating partners recall the development of commitment to wed and what factors modify recall? Motivations underlying recall suggest retrospections should demonstrate one of two patterns, developmental change or amplification. A random sample of 464 partners in heterosexual relationships graphed changes in commitment to wed monthly for 8 months and then graphed them from memory. Results supported the developmental change hypothesis; retrospective reports of commitment initially were lower than concurrent reports and increased more steeply over time. This effect was moderated by changes in relationship stage, with advancement showing accuracy of recall, maintenance showing developmental change, and regression showing amplification. Accuracy of recall depends upon relationship history, which has implications for relationship outcomes and reliability of retrospective reports.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)620-639
Number of pages20
JournalPersonal Relationships
Volume21
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014

Fingerprint

Heterosexuality
Motivation
History
Maintenance
commitment
random sample
regression
history

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Anthropology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies

Cite this

A comparison of concurrent and retrospective trajectories of commitment to wed. / Ogolsky, Brian Gabriel; Surra, Catherine A.

In: Personal Relationships, Vol. 21, No. 4, 01.12.2014, p. 620-639.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f87d31437c0042bc96842b56e26c1041,
title = "A comparison of concurrent and retrospective trajectories of commitment to wed",
abstract = "How well do dating partners recall the development of commitment to wed and what factors modify recall? Motivations underlying recall suggest retrospections should demonstrate one of two patterns, developmental change or amplification. A random sample of 464 partners in heterosexual relationships graphed changes in commitment to wed monthly for 8 months and then graphed them from memory. Results supported the developmental change hypothesis; retrospective reports of commitment initially were lower than concurrent reports and increased more steeply over time. This effect was moderated by changes in relationship stage, with advancement showing accuracy of recall, maintenance showing developmental change, and regression showing amplification. Accuracy of recall depends upon relationship history, which has implications for relationship outcomes and reliability of retrospective reports.",
author = "Ogolsky, {Brian Gabriel} and Surra, {Catherine A.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pere.12054",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "620--639",
journal = "Personal Relationships",
issn = "1350-4126",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A comparison of concurrent and retrospective trajectories of commitment to wed

AU - Ogolsky, Brian Gabriel

AU - Surra, Catherine A.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - How well do dating partners recall the development of commitment to wed and what factors modify recall? Motivations underlying recall suggest retrospections should demonstrate one of two patterns, developmental change or amplification. A random sample of 464 partners in heterosexual relationships graphed changes in commitment to wed monthly for 8 months and then graphed them from memory. Results supported the developmental change hypothesis; retrospective reports of commitment initially were lower than concurrent reports and increased more steeply over time. This effect was moderated by changes in relationship stage, with advancement showing accuracy of recall, maintenance showing developmental change, and regression showing amplification. Accuracy of recall depends upon relationship history, which has implications for relationship outcomes and reliability of retrospective reports.

AB - How well do dating partners recall the development of commitment to wed and what factors modify recall? Motivations underlying recall suggest retrospections should demonstrate one of two patterns, developmental change or amplification. A random sample of 464 partners in heterosexual relationships graphed changes in commitment to wed monthly for 8 months and then graphed them from memory. Results supported the developmental change hypothesis; retrospective reports of commitment initially were lower than concurrent reports and increased more steeply over time. This effect was moderated by changes in relationship stage, with advancement showing accuracy of recall, maintenance showing developmental change, and regression showing amplification. Accuracy of recall depends upon relationship history, which has implications for relationship outcomes and reliability of retrospective reports.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916879897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84916879897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pere.12054

DO - 10.1111/pere.12054

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 620

EP - 639

JO - Personal Relationships

JF - Personal Relationships

SN - 1350-4126

IS - 4

ER -