Abstract
A study comparing the rate of cyclopropanation of a range of olefins using (chloromethyl)- and (iodomethyl)zinc reagents is described. The (chloromethyl)zinc reagent derived from diethylzinc and chloroiodomethane is generally more reactive than the (iodomethyl)zinc analogue. The use of 1,2-dichloroethane as the solvent for these reactions was shown to be a crucial factor necessary to achieve clean, rapid, high-yielding cyclopropanations. The well-known directing effect of proximal oxygen substituents on the stereochemical outcome of “Simmons-Smith” cyclopropanations was shown to hold for the (chloromethyl)zinc reagent as well. The diethylzinc/chloroiodomethane reagent system in 1,2-dichloroethane should prove to be a valuable alternative to traditional (iodomethyl)zinc-based cyclopropanation reagents.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 6974-6981 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Journal of Organic Chemistry |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 25 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 1 1991 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Organic Chemistry
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparison of (Chloromethyl)- and (Iodomethyl)zinc Cyclopropanation Reagents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS