TY - JOUR
T1 - A Case Study of a Successful Park and Recreation Voter Referendum
AU - Pitas, Nicholas Andrew
AU - Kerins, Andrew
AU - Zou, Sharon
AU - Jaquet, Izabelle
N1 - Disclosure Statement: One member of the research team concurrently volunteers as a member of the Board of Commissioners for the agency profiled in this manuscript. This individual recused themselves from the recruitment, consent, and data collection process. Funding: An internal grant from the University of Illinois Community-Academic Scholar Program funded work by a student member of the research team.
PY - 2023/9/1
Y1 - 2023/9/1
N2 - To keep pace with ongoing maintenance and service needs, address inconsistencies in tax-based allocations, and increase overall capacity, many park and recreation agencies utilize voter referenda—a form of direct democracy, wherein citizens hold decision-making authority in specific elements of the public policy process— to increase tax-based funding. These referenda take a variety of forms, including permanent increases to property, income, or sales tax, or the approval of a one-time bond resolution. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide a case study of a successful referendum process, and to provide a series of practical suggestions for agencies and nonprofit friends groups that wish to appeal directly to voters for additional funding. To do so, we conducted a focus group and a series of in-depth interviews with key stakeholders engaged in the referendum process. Based on this work, we describe a series of effective practices. Organizations engaged in the referendum process will benefit from the development of sufficient organizational capacity through a lengthy planning process, including a substantial “quiet period” prior to publicly announcing plans for a referendum. Respondents also described the importance of utilizing multiple forms of data (e.g., public opinion polling, and visitor use data) to help guide actions and build a clear argument for the referendum’s necessity. Relationships with community groups with compatible missions (e.g., conservation or sport-oriented organizations) were cited as valuable, as were bridging relationships with potential opponents. Proactively working to engage partners, and to defuse potential sources of opposition, was seen as a critical step. Communication should be tailored to resonate with specific stakeholder groups but constructed with a cohesive set of messages that are consistently applied. Multiple forms of traditional and social media were utilized effectively, with photos and videos used to simplify complex ideas. As a referendum eventually boils down to a “yes” or “no” decision, care should be taken to translate unfriendly ballot language into a manageable format. Because public employees may be constrained in their capacity to advocate for an issue, the development of a strong volunteer organization may be critical to effective communications.
AB - To keep pace with ongoing maintenance and service needs, address inconsistencies in tax-based allocations, and increase overall capacity, many park and recreation agencies utilize voter referenda—a form of direct democracy, wherein citizens hold decision-making authority in specific elements of the public policy process— to increase tax-based funding. These referenda take a variety of forms, including permanent increases to property, income, or sales tax, or the approval of a one-time bond resolution. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide a case study of a successful referendum process, and to provide a series of practical suggestions for agencies and nonprofit friends groups that wish to appeal directly to voters for additional funding. To do so, we conducted a focus group and a series of in-depth interviews with key stakeholders engaged in the referendum process. Based on this work, we describe a series of effective practices. Organizations engaged in the referendum process will benefit from the development of sufficient organizational capacity through a lengthy planning process, including a substantial “quiet period” prior to publicly announcing plans for a referendum. Respondents also described the importance of utilizing multiple forms of data (e.g., public opinion polling, and visitor use data) to help guide actions and build a clear argument for the referendum’s necessity. Relationships with community groups with compatible missions (e.g., conservation or sport-oriented organizations) were cited as valuable, as were bridging relationships with potential opponents. Proactively working to engage partners, and to defuse potential sources of opposition, was seen as a critical step. Communication should be tailored to resonate with specific stakeholder groups but constructed with a cohesive set of messages that are consistently applied. Multiple forms of traditional and social media were utilized effectively, with photos and videos used to simplify complex ideas. As a referendum eventually boils down to a “yes” or “no” decision, care should be taken to translate unfriendly ballot language into a manageable format. Because public employees may be constrained in their capacity to advocate for an issue, the development of a strong volunteer organization may be critical to effective communications.
KW - Programs that work
KW - case study
KW - funding
KW - local parks and recreation
KW - qualitative research
KW - referendum
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85165923838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85165923838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.18666/JPRA-2022-11555
DO - 10.18666/JPRA-2022-11555
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85165923838
SN - 0735-1968
VL - 41
SP - 30
EP - 40
JO - Journal of Park and Recreation Administration
JF - Journal of Park and Recreation Administration
IS - 3
ER -