TY - GEN
T1 - A Brief Review of Electrospray Propulsion Diagnostics
AU - Lyne, Christopher T.
AU - Liu, Miron F.
AU - Rovey, Joshua L.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - We review common experimental techniques used in electrospray propulsion, including the direct measurement of thrust and propellant flow rate, and the measurement of plume properties such as mass flux, mass-to-charge distribution, and stopping potential distribution. We also discuss more complex diagnostics, such as using retarding potential and mass spectrometry in tandem. Plume diagnostics are summarized in a table for convenience. Next, we discuss how thrust and propellant flow rate can be estimated from plume data. Citing recent examples from the literature, we show that indirect ‘measurements’ of thrust and flow rate generally agree with direct measurements within ~15% for capillary electrospray thrusters. For passively fed thrusters, plume-based estimates of thrust are reasonably accurate, but plume-based estimates of propellant flow rate are not reliable, differing from direct measurements by a factor of ~2.5 in one prominent study. These conclusions highlight the need for direct measurements, when possible, and for continued investigation of mass loss mechanisms in passively fed electrospray thrusters.
AB - We review common experimental techniques used in electrospray propulsion, including the direct measurement of thrust and propellant flow rate, and the measurement of plume properties such as mass flux, mass-to-charge distribution, and stopping potential distribution. We also discuss more complex diagnostics, such as using retarding potential and mass spectrometry in tandem. Plume diagnostics are summarized in a table for convenience. Next, we discuss how thrust and propellant flow rate can be estimated from plume data. Citing recent examples from the literature, we show that indirect ‘measurements’ of thrust and flow rate generally agree with direct measurements within ~15% for capillary electrospray thrusters. For passively fed thrusters, plume-based estimates of thrust are reasonably accurate, but plume-based estimates of propellant flow rate are not reliable, differing from direct measurements by a factor of ~2.5 in one prominent study. These conclusions highlight the need for direct measurements, when possible, and for continued investigation of mass loss mechanisms in passively fed electrospray thrusters.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85200112838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85200112838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2514/6.2023-0263
DO - 10.2514/6.2023-0263
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85200112838
SN - 9781624106996
T3 - AIAA SciTech Forum and Exposition, 2023
BT - AIAA SciTech Forum and Exposition, 2023
PB - American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc, AIAA
T2 - AIAA SciTech Forum and Exposition, 2023
Y2 - 23 January 2023 through 27 January 2023
ER -