A bioenergy feedstock/vegetable double-cropping system

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Certain warm-season vegetable crops may lend themselves to bioenergy double-cropping systems, which involve growing a winter annual bioenergy feedstock crop followed by a summer annual crop. The objective of the study was to compare crop productivity and weed communities in different pumpkin production systems, varying in tillage, cover crop, and bioenergy feedstock/pumpkin double-cropping. Using a fall-planted rye (Secale cereale)+hairy vetch (Vicia villosa) mixture as a candidate feedstock, on average 9.9Mgha-1 of dry biomass was produced prior to pumpkin planting. Pumpkin yields in the cover crop system, which involved leaving the bioenergy feedstock on the soil surface, ranged from 49% to 65% of the conventional pumpkin system. When the bioenergy feedstock was removed, pumpkin yields in the feedstock tillage system were comparable to the conventional pumpkin system. Weeds remained problematic in all cropping systems; however, cropping systems without tillage (i.e. no-tillage and feedstock no-till systems) had among the highest weed population densities in pumpkin. The feedstock tillage system reduced potentially leachable soil N in the spring, produced enough bioenergy feedstock to theoretically yield an estimated 3260liters of ethanolha-1 without negatively affecting processing pumpkin yield, and had a farmgate value comparable to, or greater than, the conventional pumpkin production system currently used by growers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)223-227
Number of pages5
JournalIndustrial Crops and Products
Volume59
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2014

Keywords

  • Biofuel
  • Cover crop
  • Farmgate value
  • Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata)
  • Rye (Secale cereale)
  • Weed control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Agronomy and Crop Science

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A bioenergy feedstock/vegetable double-cropping system'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this