TY - GEN
T1 - A 1.5GHz 890μW digital MDLL with 400fs rms integrated jitter, -55.6dBc reference spur and 20fs/mV supply-noise sensitivity using 1b TDC
AU - Elshazly, Amr
AU - Inti, Rajesh
AU - Young, Brian
AU - Hanumolu, Pavan Kumar
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Highly digital clock generator architectures, most commonly implemented using digital phase-locked loops (DPLLs), are evolving as the preferred means for synthesizing on-chip clocks. Their main benefits include small area, reduced sensitivity to analog circuit imperfections, and easier scalability to newer processes. However, conflicting bandwidth requirements to simultaneously suppress TDC quantization error and oscillator phase noise poses several design challenges. For instance, a lower bandwidth suppresses TDC quantization error but cannot adequately suppress oscillator phase noise and vice versa. Consequently, either a high-resolution TDC or a low-noise oscillator is needed to achieve low jitter at the expense of large power dissipation and area [1]. Jitter is also degraded by supply noise in the oscillator, which often limits the overall jitter performance of a DPLL embedded in a large SoC. A low-dropout regulator is commonly used to shield the oscillator from supply noise at the expense of additional area, power, and voltage headroom [2]. Since the worst-case jitter sensitivity occurs in the vicinity of the DPLL bandwidth, the regulator bandwidth should be many times the DPLL bandwidth [2]. Furthermore, the peaking caused by the limit cycle behavior of the DPLL further exacerbates supply sensitivity.
AB - Highly digital clock generator architectures, most commonly implemented using digital phase-locked loops (DPLLs), are evolving as the preferred means for synthesizing on-chip clocks. Their main benefits include small area, reduced sensitivity to analog circuit imperfections, and easier scalability to newer processes. However, conflicting bandwidth requirements to simultaneously suppress TDC quantization error and oscillator phase noise poses several design challenges. For instance, a lower bandwidth suppresses TDC quantization error but cannot adequately suppress oscillator phase noise and vice versa. Consequently, either a high-resolution TDC or a low-noise oscillator is needed to achieve low jitter at the expense of large power dissipation and area [1]. Jitter is also degraded by supply noise in the oscillator, which often limits the overall jitter performance of a DPLL embedded in a large SoC. A low-dropout regulator is commonly used to shield the oscillator from supply noise at the expense of additional area, power, and voltage headroom [2]. Since the worst-case jitter sensitivity occurs in the vicinity of the DPLL bandwidth, the regulator bandwidth should be many times the DPLL bandwidth [2]. Furthermore, the peaking caused by the limit cycle behavior of the DPLL further exacerbates supply sensitivity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860656775&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860656775&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ISSCC.2012.6176993
DO - 10.1109/ISSCC.2012.6176993
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84860656775
SN - 9781467303736
T3 - Digest of Technical Papers - IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference
SP - 242
EP - 243
BT - 2012 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, ISSCC 2012 - Digest of Technical Papers
T2 - 59th International Solid-State Circuits Conference, ISSCC 2012
Y2 - 19 February 2012 through 23 February 2012
ER -