TY - JOUR
T1 - 3-component reactive flow modeling of nitromethane
AU - Schuetz, Vincent
AU - Lee, Kibaek
AU - Dlott, Dana D.
AU - Stewart, D. Scott
N1 - The research described in this study is based on work at the University of Florida supported by the Office of Naval Research (ONR) under award N00014-19-1-2084 (to DSS) and Air Force Office of Scientific Research award FA9550-19-1-0204 (to DSS), and at the University of Illinois by AFOSR awards FA9550-19-1-0027, FA9550-19-1-0318, and FA9550-21-1-0448 (to DDD) and the Army Research Office under awards W911NF-19-2-0037 and W911NF-22-2-0181 (to DDD).
PY - 2023/9/26
Y1 - 2023/9/26
N2 - The shock-to-detonation transition of nitromethane (NM) is typically characterized by the so-called Pop-plot, which gives the time-to-detonation versus input shock pressure. Recently, a model was developed (Combustion Theory and Modelling 25, 413-435 (2021)) using equations of state for NM and its products along with a two-component kinetic model. This model accurately reproduced legacy data with times-to-detonation ranging from 5 µs to 100 ns. However, such data is not sensitive to the NM chemical kinetic rates which occur on the 11 ns time scale of the NM reaction zone. Recent experiments (J. Appl. Phys. 124, 075901 (2018)) using 4 ns input shocks, where the time-to-detonation was 12 ns, were simulated with the two-component model and the agreement with experiment was poor, since the model predicted a decaying shock rather than a detonation, and it failed to predict several features at shorter times. These results indicate that a kinetic model with more than two components, that accurately reproduces the shorter-time processes in shocked NM, is needed to create an experimentally-validated theory that can predict the response of NM to shock waves and the interaction of NM detonations with external perturbations.
AB - The shock-to-detonation transition of nitromethane (NM) is typically characterized by the so-called Pop-plot, which gives the time-to-detonation versus input shock pressure. Recently, a model was developed (Combustion Theory and Modelling 25, 413-435 (2021)) using equations of state for NM and its products along with a two-component kinetic model. This model accurately reproduced legacy data with times-to-detonation ranging from 5 µs to 100 ns. However, such data is not sensitive to the NM chemical kinetic rates which occur on the 11 ns time scale of the NM reaction zone. Recent experiments (J. Appl. Phys. 124, 075901 (2018)) using 4 ns input shocks, where the time-to-detonation was 12 ns, were simulated with the two-component model and the agreement with experiment was poor, since the model predicted a decaying shock rather than a detonation, and it failed to predict several features at shorter times. These results indicate that a kinetic model with more than two components, that accurately reproduces the shorter-time processes in shocked NM, is needed to create an experimentally-validated theory that can predict the response of NM to shock waves and the interaction of NM detonations with external perturbations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177568297&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85177568297&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1063/12.0020424
DO - 10.1063/12.0020424
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:85177568297
SN - 0094-243X
VL - 2844
JO - AIP Conference Proceedings
JF - AIP Conference Proceedings
IS - 1
M1 - 290011
T2 - 22nd Biennial American Physical Society Conference on Shock Compression of Condensed Matter, SCCM 2022
Y2 - 10 July 2022 through 15 July 2022
ER -