TY - GEN
T1 - 18.5 A 54MHz Crystal Oscillator with 30× 18.5 Start-Up Time Reduction Using 2-Step Injection in 65nm CMOS
AU - Megawer, Karim M.
AU - Pal, Nilanjan
AU - Elkholy, Ahmed
AU - Ahmed, Mostafa G.
AU - Khashaba, Amr
AU - Griffith, Danielle
AU - Hanumolu, Pavan Kumar
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 IEEE.
PY - 2019/3/6
Y1 - 2019/3/6
N2 - The start-up time of crystal oscillators (TSTART) is a major bottleneck in reducing the average power of heavily duty-cycled wireless /wireline communication systems [1]. Among all the reported schemes to reduce TSTART, techniques that increase initial noise amplitude by injecting a surge of energy into the crystal resonator are shown to be most effective [1-3]. These approaches are proven to be robust if the frequency of the injection signal is equal to the crystal oscillator (XO) frequency (FINJ = FX0), which is difficult to achieve across PVT with on-chip oscillators. Any mismatch (ΔF = FINJ - FX0) even as small as a few 100 ppm can greatly increase TSTART. Sweeping the injection frequency using a chirp oscillator [2]or dithering the injection frequency between two values [1]can partially alleviate this issue but because δ text{F} neq 0, this only reduces TSTART to about 14× the theoretical minimum in [2]. On the other hand, it was shown in [3] that the use of a precise injection period TINJ,OPT can help reduce TSTART even in the presence of large ΔF. TINJ,OPT must be chosen such that current in the motional branch of the resonator, im(t), reaches its steady-state value, Im,SS (im(TINJ, OPT) = Im,SS) as shown in Fig. 18.5.1 [3]. However, small TSTART and large tolerance to ΔF can be achieved only when Im,SS is very small, which translates to small XO output amplitude (VXO < 200mV) and degraded phase noise. For example, as illustrated in Fig. 18.5.1, TSTART ≈ TINJ,OPT because im(TINJ, OPT) = Im,SS1 even when ΔF is as large as 1000ppm. However, for Im,SS2 > Im,SS1, no TINJ can ensure im(TINJ) = Im,SS2 if ΔF > 1000ppm, thus greatly increasing TSTART. Therefore, ΔF must be small (<500ppm) to achieve a large VXO even with precisely-timed injection, a condition that is difficult to meet in practice even with the best-reported temperature-compensated on-chip oscillators [4]. In view of these drawbacks, we present a robust 2-step injection technique that can tolerate large ΔF and achieves close to theoretical minimum TSTART, large output swing and excellent phase noise. Fabricated in a 65nm CMOS process, the prototype XO achieves TSTART of less than 20 μs across the -40°C to 85°C temperature range, which is within 1.5× of the theoretical minimum and represents an over-30× reduction in TSTART compared to that of a normal/uninjected XO.
AB - The start-up time of crystal oscillators (TSTART) is a major bottleneck in reducing the average power of heavily duty-cycled wireless /wireline communication systems [1]. Among all the reported schemes to reduce TSTART, techniques that increase initial noise amplitude by injecting a surge of energy into the crystal resonator are shown to be most effective [1-3]. These approaches are proven to be robust if the frequency of the injection signal is equal to the crystal oscillator (XO) frequency (FINJ = FX0), which is difficult to achieve across PVT with on-chip oscillators. Any mismatch (ΔF = FINJ - FX0) even as small as a few 100 ppm can greatly increase TSTART. Sweeping the injection frequency using a chirp oscillator [2]or dithering the injection frequency between two values [1]can partially alleviate this issue but because δ text{F} neq 0, this only reduces TSTART to about 14× the theoretical minimum in [2]. On the other hand, it was shown in [3] that the use of a precise injection period TINJ,OPT can help reduce TSTART even in the presence of large ΔF. TINJ,OPT must be chosen such that current in the motional branch of the resonator, im(t), reaches its steady-state value, Im,SS (im(TINJ, OPT) = Im,SS) as shown in Fig. 18.5.1 [3]. However, small TSTART and large tolerance to ΔF can be achieved only when Im,SS is very small, which translates to small XO output amplitude (VXO < 200mV) and degraded phase noise. For example, as illustrated in Fig. 18.5.1, TSTART ≈ TINJ,OPT because im(TINJ, OPT) = Im,SS1 even when ΔF is as large as 1000ppm. However, for Im,SS2 > Im,SS1, no TINJ can ensure im(TINJ) = Im,SS2 if ΔF > 1000ppm, thus greatly increasing TSTART. Therefore, ΔF must be small (<500ppm) to achieve a large VXO even with precisely-timed injection, a condition that is difficult to meet in practice even with the best-reported temperature-compensated on-chip oscillators [4]. In view of these drawbacks, we present a robust 2-step injection technique that can tolerate large ΔF and achieves close to theoretical minimum TSTART, large output swing and excellent phase noise. Fabricated in a 65nm CMOS process, the prototype XO achieves TSTART of less than 20 μs across the -40°C to 85°C temperature range, which is within 1.5× of the theoretical minimum and represents an over-30× reduction in TSTART compared to that of a normal/uninjected XO.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85063520487&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85063520487&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ISSCC.2019.8662403
DO - 10.1109/ISSCC.2019.8662403
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85063520487
T3 - Digest of Technical Papers - IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference
SP - 302
EP - 304
BT - 2019 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, ISSCC 2019
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2019 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference, ISSCC 2019
Y2 - 17 February 2019 through 21 February 2019
ER -