Research output per year
Research output per year
Personal profile
Office Address
203 Shelford Vivarium
608 East Healey Street
Champaign, IL 61820
Office Phone
217-244-3513
Fingerprint
Fingerprint is based on mining the text of the expert's scholarly documents to create an index of weighted terms, which defines the key subjects of each individual researcher.
- 1 Similar Profiles
Collaborations and top research areas from the last five years
Recent external collaboration on country/territory level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots or
-
Cochlea development shapes bat sensory system evolution
Anthwal, N., Hall, R. P., de la Rosa Hernandez, F. A., Koger, M., Yohe, L. R., Hedrick, B. P., Davies, K. T. J., Mutumi, G. L., Roseman, C. C., Dumont, E. R., Dávalos, L. M., Rossiter, S. J., Sadier, A. & Sears, K. E., 2023, (Accepted/In press) In: Anatomical Record.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
Variation in ontogenetic trajectories of limb dimensions in humans is attributable to both climatic effects and neutral evolution
Yim, A. D., Cowgill, L., Katz, D. C. & Roseman, C. C., Jun 2023, In: Journal of Human Evolution. 179, 103369.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open Access -
Reliability is No Vice: Environmental Variance and Human Agency
Roseman, C. C. & Kaplan, J. M., Sep 2022, In: Biological Theory.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
The genetic basis of neurocranial size and shape across varied lab mouse populations
Percival, C. J., Devine, J., Hassan, C. R., Vidal-Garcia, M., O'Connor-Coates, C. J., Zaffarini, E., Roseman, C., Katz, D. & Hallgrimsson, B., Aug 2022, In: Journal of Anatomy. 241, 2, p. 211-229 19 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open Access -
Lewontin did not commit Lewontin's fallacy, his critics do: Why racial taxonomy is not useful for the scientific study of human variation
Roseman, C. C., Dec 2021, In: BioEssays. 43, 12, 2100204.Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review